statlyst

Developer tools · ranking

10 Best HIPAA-Compliant Databases of 2026

Statlyst data desk · updated November 11, 2026 · next review December 26, 2026

Amazon RDS is the best database for healthcare in 2026 because AWS lists six of its engines, including PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQL Server, as HIPAA eligible under the AWS BAA; MongoDB Atlas suits teams storing FHIR-style JSON, since its self-serve terms already include a BAA and Dedicated clusters start at about $56.94 per month. The cheapest entries as of November 2026 are Google Cloud SQL from $0.0105 per hour and Crunchy Bridge from $10 per month, while teams that want FHIR built into the database should look at InterSystems IRIS for Health.

Market data

#ProductFeatures (35%)Adoption and reviews (35%)Value (30%)OverallUsers or customersFrom
1Amazon RDS9.38.97.68.7$46.0 billion (2026)Check price
2MongoDB Atlas9.09.17.68.629% (2026)$56.94
3Google Cloud SQL8.78.58.28.5$30.7 billion (2026)$0.01
4Azure SQL Database8.88.67.48.327.1% (2026)Check price
5Supabase8.68.47.28.110 million (2026)$599
6Neon8.37.67.87.980% (2025)$0.22
7InterSystems IRIS for Health9.07.86.47.8More than one billion (2026)Check price
8Oracle Autonomous AI Database8.67.66.87.79.4% (2026)Check price
9Crunchy Bridge7.85.88.67.3n/a$10
10Aptible8.46.27.07.2n/a$499

Adoption figures come from company filings, official releases or independent surveys, linked in each entry. We compared documented features and published prices; we did not run hands-on tests. Scoring method

This list is for healthcare software teams choosing a database or managed database service that can hold protected health information under a Business Associate Agreement (BAA). Each option is scored on documented features for regulated data (35 percent), adoption backed by filings, company figures or the 2026 Stack Overflow Developer Survey (35 percent), and value at published US prices (30 percent). Prices are the cheapest plan that can be used for PHI where the vendor says so, in the vendor's own unit. A BAA alone does not make you compliant: encryption, access control, audit logs and your own policies remain your responsibility. We compared documented features and published prices and did not run benchmarks.

AssessmentAmazon RDS is the safest default because six engines sit on the AWS HIPAA eligible services list and Multi-AZ deployments carry an SLA of up to 99.95%. MongoDB Atlas is the easiest BAA to obtain, Google Cloud SQL has the lowest hyperscaler entry rate, and Azure SQL Database fits SQL Server shops. Supabase and Neon are the strongest Postgres platforms for small teams, with HIPAA on Team ($599 per month plus add-on) and Scale respectively. InterSystems IRIS for Health and Oracle serve large health systems, while Crunchy Bridge and Aptible cover budget Postgres and fully managed compliant hosting.

  1. 1

    Amazon RDS

    8.7overall

    AWS's managed relational database service for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle and Db2.

    Best forhealthcare teams already building on AWS

    Adoption data

    $46.0 billionAmazon reported AWS segment sales of $46.0 billion in the third quarter of 2026, up 39% year over year; Amazon does not break out RDS revenue.

    Amazon, Amazon.com Announces Third Quarter Results (2026): “AWS segment sales increased 39% year-over-year to $46.0 billion.”

    Amazon RDS is the default answer for healthcare software that runs on AWS. AWS lists Amazon RDS on its HIPAA eligible services reference for the SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Db2 and MariaDB engines, so a team that has accepted the AWS BAA can keep patient records in the same account as its application servers and storage. The production features matter for clinical systems: Multi-AZ deployments replicate synchronously to a standby in another Availability Zone and carry an SLA of up to 99.95%, and a variant with two readable standbys spreads one primary and two replicas across three zones. The weak point for buyers is price transparency. RDS bills per instance hour, storage, I/O and backup, and the instance table on the pricing page loads in a calculator, so we left the entry price as pending. HIPAA eligibility does not configure itself, either: you still turn on encryption, restrict access and keep audit logs. We compared documented features and published prices.

    Strengths

    • +Six database engines are covered by the AWS HIPAA eligible services list
    • +Fits teams that already sign the AWS BAA for compute and storage
    • +Multi-AZ SLA of up to 99.95% for production patient data

    Limitations

    • −Instance prices load in a calculator, so we could not confirm a USD entry rate here
    • −T4g and T3 instances charge $0.075 per vCPU-hour for CPU credits above baseline
    • −HIPAA eligibility covers the service, not your configuration: encryption, access and logging remain your job

    SummaryAmazon RDS is the best choice for healthcare teams on AWS because six engines sit on the AWS HIPAA eligible services list under one BAA. Budget time for a cost estimate, since instance pricing is calculator driven.

  2. 2

    MongoDB Atlas

    8.6overall

    MongoDB's managed document database, with a BAA built into the cloud terms for self-serve accounts.

    Best forhealthcare apps with flexible or nested patient records

    Adoption data

    29%MongoDB reported that Atlas revenue grew about 29% year over year in its fiscal 2027 second quarter, which ended July 31, 2026.

    MongoDB, MongoDB, Inc. Announces Second Quarter Fiscal 2027 Financial Results (Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1) (2026): “Atlas revenue up approximately 29% year-over-year in the second quarter fiscal 2027”

    MongoDB Atlas makes the BAA step unusually simple. Its HIPAA page says a Business Associate Agreement is included in the MongoDB Cloud Terms of Service for self-service, pay-as-you-go accounts, so a small team does not need to wait on a signed contract before storing protected health information. Organizations billed by invoice under an Order Form must still ask sales for one. The BAA covers Atlas, App Services, Charts, Atlas Serverless, Cloud Manager and Atlas Data Lake, and it excludes anything in beta or preview. For production health data, the relevant tier is Dedicated, which starts at $0.08 per hour, about $56.94 per month, and scales from 10 GB to 4 TB of storage and up to 96 vCPUs. MongoDB reported Atlas revenue growth of about 29% in the quarter ended July 31, 2026. The document model suits varied clinical payloads such as FHIR resources, but relational reporting is less natural than in Postgres or SQL Server. We compared documented features and published prices.

    Strengths

    • +No separate BAA paperwork for self-serve, pay-as-you-go accounts
    • +Hourly prices for every tier are published in USD
    • +MongoDB reports Atlas growth in SEC filings

    Limitations

    • −Invoice customers on an Order Form must request a BAA from sales before storing PHI
    • −Beta and preview features are outside the BAA
    • −Document model, so teams that want SQL joins should look at the relational options

    SummaryMongoDB Atlas is the best choice for teams storing FHIR-style JSON records because its self-serve terms already include a BAA. Plan on Dedicated clusters from about $56.94 per month for production PHI.

  3. 3

    Google Cloud SQL

    8.5overall

    Google Cloud's managed PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQL Server service, covered by the Google Cloud BAA.

    Best forbudget-conscious teams on Google Cloud

    Adoption data

    $30.7 billionAlphabet reported Google Cloud revenue of $30.7 billion in the third quarter of 2026, up 103%; Google does not report Cloud SQL revenue on its own.

    Alphabet, Alphabet Announces Third Quarter 2026 Results (Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1) (2026): “Google Cloud delivered record growth as revenues increased 103% to $30.7 billion”

    Google Cloud SQL is the lowest-cost way into a hyperscaler database that sits under a BAA. Google's HIPAA page lists Cloud SQL among the covered products and says the BAA spans the entire Google Cloud infrastructure, so you are not restricted to particular regions. It also states that HIPAA-regulated customers get the same services at the same pricing as everyone else. The smallest shared-core instance, db-f1-micro, costs $0.0105 per hour, and an HA version costs $0.021 per hour, but shared-core machines are not covered by the Cloud SQL SLA, so production patient data belongs on dedicated-core instances. Enterprise edition carries a 99.95% availability SLA and Enterprise Plus a 99.99% SLA. Cloud SQL runs PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQL Server, which covers most healthcare application stacks. New customers can start with a 30-day trial instance and $300 in credits. We compared documented features and published prices.

    Strengths

    • +Lowest published hyperscaler entry rate in this list at $0.0105 per hour
    • +Google says HIPAA customers get the same services and pricing as everyone else
    • +BAA is not limited to specific regions

    Limitations

    • −Shared-core db-f1-micro and db-g1-small instances are not covered by the Cloud SQL SLA
    • −High availability doubles the shared-core hourly rate to $0.021
    • −Three engines only, with no Oracle or Db2 option

    SummaryGoogle Cloud SQL is the best value for healthcare teams on Google Cloud because its BAA covers every region and entry instances start at $0.0105 per hour. Move to dedicated cores for production data that needs the SLA.

  4. 4

    Azure SQL Database

    8.3overall

    Microsoft's managed SQL Server engine in Azure, covered by the HIPAA BAA in the Microsoft Product Terms.

    Best forMicrosoft and SQL Server shops

    Adoption data

    27.1%In the 2026 Stack Overflow Developer Survey, 27.1% of the 12,061 respondents who answered the database question used Microsoft SQL Server, the engine behind Azure SQL Database.

    Stack Overflow, 2026 Developer Survey: Databases (2026): “Microsoft SQL Server 3,270 27.1%”

    Azure SQL Database is the natural pick for healthcare organizations that already run SQL Server and Microsoft 365. Microsoft says it offers a HIPAA BAA as part of the Microsoft Product Terms to all customers who are covered entities or business associates, for in-scope Azure services, so the agreement does not need a separate negotiation. The security features map well to PHI: transport layer security in transit, transparent data encryption at rest, and Always Encrypted for data in use, plus data discovery and classification to find and label sensitive columns. Point-in-time restore works within the automatic backup retention period, and single and pooled databases support active geo-replication. SQL Server remains widely used: 27.1% of database respondents in the 2026 Stack Overflow survey reported using it. The drawback is cost clarity, since Azure offers vCore and DTU models and the page we fetched did not show USD rates, so the price is pending. We compared documented features and published prices.

    Strengths

    • +BAA comes through the standard Product Terms rather than a separate negotiation
    • +Always Encrypted keeps selected columns encrypted even from database administrators
    • +Familiar T-SQL engine for teams moving from on-premises SQL Server

    Limitations

    • −Prices did not render in USD on the page we fetched, so the entry rate is pending
    • −Two purchase models, vCore and DTU, make cost comparison harder
    • −SQL Server only, with no PostgreSQL option inside this service

    SummaryAzure SQL Database is the best choice for SQL Server shops because the HIPAA BAA is part of Microsoft's standard Product Terms and Always Encrypted protects columns in use. Use the Azure calculator to price vCore or DTU options.

  5. 5

    Supabase

    8.1overall

    Hosted Postgres with auth, storage and APIs, with HIPAA available as a paid add-on on Team and Enterprise.

    Best forsmall product teams building full-stack health apps

    Adoption data

    10 millionSupabase said in its Series F announcement in 2026 that nearly 10 million developers build on its platform.

    Supabase, Supabase Series F (2026): “Nearly 10 million developers build on Supabase today, more than doubling since our last fundraising announcement eight months ago.”

    Supabase is the quickest route to a complete HIPAA backend for a small team, but the entry price is high. Its pricing page lists HIPAA as a paid add-on on the Team plan, which starts at $599 per month, and on Enterprise. The HIPAA projects guide says organizations must have a signed BAA with Supabase and the add-on enabled before handling PHI, and the compliance guide notes that Supabase has signed BAAs with vendors such as AWS that could access ePHI. The appeal is scope: one agreement covers Postgres plus auth, storage and functions, so a telehealth or patient-portal app does not stitch together several vendors. Team also adds SOC 2 and ISO 27001 reports, SSO and 14 days of daily backups. Supabase reports nearly 10 million developers on the platform. Weigh that against the add-on fee, which is not published, and note that self-hosted Supabase does not carry the HIPAA controls out of the box. We compared documented features and published prices.

    Strengths

    • +One BAA covers database, auth and file storage for a full app backend
    • +Standard Postgres, so data and SQL move to other hosts
    • +Self-serve start on Free or Pro before the HIPAA move

    Limitations

    • −HIPAA starts at the $599 per month Team plan plus an add-on whose price is not published
    • −Self-hosted Supabase does not include the HIPAA controls out of the box
    • −Free and Pro plans exclude HIPAA

    SummarySupabase is the best choice for small teams that want database, auth and storage under one BAA because its Team plan bundles all three. Expect at least $599 per month plus the HIPAA add-on.

  6. 6

    Neon

    7.9overall

    Serverless Postgres from Databricks with self-serve HIPAA on the Scale plan.

    Best forteams wanting self-serve HIPAA Postgres billed by usage

    Adoption data

    80%Databricks said when it agreed to acquire Neon in 2025 that over 80% of databases provisioned on Neon were created by AI agents rather than people.

    Databricks, Databricks Agrees to Acquire Neon to Help Developers Deliver AI Systems (2025): “Recent internal telemetry showed that over 80 percent of the databases provisioned on Neon were created automatically by AI agents rather than by humans”

    Neon makes HIPAA Postgres a settings change instead of a sales process. Its documentation says HIPAA is a self-serve feature on the Scale plan: you review and accept the BAA while enabling HIPAA for the organization, and the agreement is with Databricks, Neon's parent company. Neon says HIPAA support is currently free, and that a 15% surcharge will be added when it starts charging, which buyers should factor in now. Scale bills $0.222 per compute-unit hour and $0.35 per GB-month, with computes up to 56 CU and 224 GB of RAM, SLAs and private networking. Neon's own pricing example for a high-load 100 GB workload comes to about $701 per month. Branching is useful in regulated work because developers can test migrations on a copy instead of production. Adoption data is thin: the cited Databricks release describes how databases get created, not customer counts. We compared documented features and published prices.

    Strengths

    • +BAA accepted in the console during HIPAA enablement, with no sales call
    • +Usage-based billing with no fixed monthly fee
    • +Instant copy-on-write branches for testing schema changes

    Limitations

    • −HIPAA only on Scale, where Neon's typical spend example is about $701 per month
    • −Neon has announced a future 15% HIPAA surcharge
    • −No published customer count, so adoption scores lower

    SummaryNeon is the best choice for teams that want HIPAA Postgres without a sales call because the BAA is accepted self-serve on the Scale plan. Budget for usage billing and the announced 15% surcharge.

  7. 7

    InterSystems IRIS for Health

    7.8overall

    A healthcare data platform with a built-in HL7 FHIR repository, available self-managed or as a managed service.

    Best forinteroperability and FHIR-heavy health systems

    Adoption data

    More than one billionInterSystems says more than one billion health records worldwide are managed by solutions built on its technology.

    InterSystems, InterSystems IRIS for Health (2026): “Globally, more than one billion health records are managed by solutions built on InterSystems technology.”

    InterSystems IRIS for Health is the specialist in this list: a data platform built around healthcare standards rather than a general database with HIPAA paperwork attached. InterSystems describes it as providing the building blocks for any healthcare data standard, including HL7 FHIR, with an advanced FHIR repository. It extends the IRIS platform that Epic uses, and InterSystems says Epic's customer systems count 2.5 million concurrent users, and that more than one billion health records are managed by solutions built on its technology. Teams can run it themselves on a cloud covered by their BAA or use the IRIS Managed Service, which InterSystems says operates in environments audited to SOC 2 Type 2, HITRUST CSF and ISO 27001. The trade-offs are commercial. Pricing is quote-based, we did not find a published BAA statement for the managed service, and fewer developers know IRIS than Postgres. It earns its place when interoperability, not cost, drives the decision. We compared documented features and published prices.

    Strengths

    • +The only platform here designed specifically for healthcare data standards
    • +InterSystems says Epic's systems on IRIS support 2.5 million concurrent users
    • +U.S. managed-service operations hold SOC 2 Type 2 and HITRUST certifications

    Limitations

    • −No public pricing
    • −We did not find a published BAA statement for the managed service; confirm with sales
    • −Smaller developer pool than PostgreSQL, MySQL or SQL Server

    SummaryInterSystems IRIS for Health is the best choice for interoperability-heavy health systems because FHIR and other healthcare standards are built into the platform. Expect a sales-led, quote-based purchase.

  8. 8

    Oracle Autonomous AI Database

    7.7overall

    Oracle's self-managing cloud database on Exadata, listed among OCI's HIPAA-assessed services.

    Best forenterprises standardized on Oracle

    Adoption data

    9.4%In the 2026 Stack Overflow Developer Survey, 9.4% of the 12,061 respondents who answered the database question used Oracle.

    Stack Overflow, 2026 Developer Survey: Databases (2026): “Oracle 1,135 9.4%”

    Oracle Autonomous AI Database fits healthcare organizations that already run Oracle and want it managed. Oracle's HIPAA-assessed regions and services page lists Autonomous Database on Shared Exadata Infrastructure, on Dedicated Exadata Infrastructure and on Cloud at Customer, which runs inside the customer's own data center. That last option matters for hospitals whose policies keep PHI on premises. Compute is billed by ECPU with the same metric across deployments, and a fixed Developer instance with 4 ECPUs and 20 GB of storage gives a low-commitment test bed. Oracle also builds vector search and machine learning into the database. The page we fetched did not show USD rates without selecting a currency, so the price is pending, and the BAA is a contract with Oracle rather than a self-serve checkbox. Oracle was used by 9.4% of database respondents in the 2026 Stack Overflow survey, far fewer than PostgreSQL. We compared documented features and published prices.

    Strengths

    • +Dedicated Exadata and Cloud at Customer options suit hospitals with strict isolation rules
    • +Same engine many hospital and payer systems already run
    • +AI and vector features in the database, without a separate vector store

    Limitations

    • −USD prices did not render on the page we fetched, so the entry rate is pending
    • −BAA is arranged with Oracle rather than accepted self-serve
    • −Smaller share of developers than PostgreSQL or SQL Server

    SummaryOracle Autonomous AI Database is the best choice for Oracle-standardized health systems because Oracle lists its Shared, Dedicated and Cloud at Customer deployments as HIPAA assessed. Smaller teams will find the managed Postgres options simpler.

  9. 9

    Crunchy Bridge

    7.3overall

    Fully managed Postgres on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud from Crunchy Data, with HIPAA compliance listed in its security features.

    Best forPostgres teams that want the lowest flat monthly price

    Crunchy Bridge is a managed Postgres service from Crunchy Data, and it has the lowest flat monthly entry in this list. The pricing page says plans start at $10 per month and that prices include infrastructure, backups, data transfer and connection pooling, with storage at $0.10 per GB. Clusters run on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud, and the product page lists single-tenant isolation, a SOC 2 Type 2 report, VPC and VNET peering and encryption at rest and in transit, alongside support for HIPAA compliance. What we could not find is a public BAA document or a statement of which plans it covers, so ask Crunchy Data for the agreement before you load PHI. The smallest Hobby instances have between half a gigabyte and 4 GB of memory, so most production clinical systems will start on Standard plans at $70 per month or more. We compared documented features and published prices.

    Strengths

    • +Cheapest flat monthly entry in this list at $10
    • +Choice of three clouds without changing vendor
    • +Storage priced simply at $0.10 per GB

    Limitations

    • −We did not find a published BAA document or plan requirement; confirm terms with Crunchy Data
    • −Hobby instances have half a GB to 4 GB of memory, too small for most clinical workloads
    • −No published customer count, so adoption scores low

    SummaryCrunchy Bridge is the best budget choice for Postgres teams because plans start at $10 per month with backups and data transfer included. Get the BAA in writing before storing patient data.

  10. 10

    Aptible

    7.2overall

    A platform for digital health teams that deploys apps and managed databases with HIPAA controls applied automatically.

    Best fordigital health startups without a DevOps team

    Aptible is less a database than a compliant hosting platform with managed databases built in, and that is its appeal for small digital health teams. The Production plan, from a $499 monthly base fee plus usage, deploys into a dedicated private network with high availability and, in Aptible's words, 100% of HIPAA controls applied automatically. Managed database types include PostgreSQL, MySQL, Redis, Elasticsearch, InfluxDB and RabbitMQ. Backups are compressed and encrypted, run daily, can be copied to another region, and PostgreSQL supports point-in-time recovery. Because apps and databases live on the same platform, a startup gets one vendor for the hosting part of its HIPAA program instead of assembling it on a raw cloud account. The costs add up: the base fee comes before containers and storage, and HITRUST or PCI need Enterprise. Aptible does not publish customer counts, so adoption scores lower than the big clouds. We compared documented features and published prices.

    Strengths

    • +Built for digital health, with HIPAA and SOC 2 frameworks on the Production plan
    • +Hosts the application and the database under one vendor
    • +Startup Program offers discounted infrastructure for the first 6 months

    Limitations

    • −$499 per month base fee before any infrastructure usage
    • −Smaller vendor without published customer counts
    • −HITRUST and PCI require the Enterprise plan

    SummaryAptible is the best choice for digital health startups without DevOps staff because its Production plan applies HIPAA controls to apps and databases automatically. The $499 monthly base fee comes before usage.

Choosing a product

Confirm the BAA and what it covers
Every vendor here handles the BAA differently. MongoDB includes it in its self-serve Cloud Terms, Microsoft in its Product Terms, Neon in a self-serve console step on Scale, and Supabase by signed agreement plus a paid add-on. Check which services and features the agreement names: MongoDB excludes beta and preview features, and AWS lists RDS only for specific engines.
Check which plan is HIPAA eligible
Free tiers rarely qualify. Supabase requires Team ($599 per month) or Enterprise, Neon requires Scale ($0.222 per CU-hour), and Aptible requires Production ($499 per month base fee). Price the eligible plan, not the entry plan.
Pick the data model that matches your records
Relational engines such as PostgreSQL, SQL Server and Oracle suit billing, scheduling and reporting. Document stores such as MongoDB Atlas keep FHIR resources close to their JSON shape, and InterSystems IRIS for Health builds a FHIR repository into the platform.
Plan for availability, backups and recovery
Clinical systems need recovery plans. Amazon RDS Multi-AZ offers up to 99.95% availability, Cloud SQL Enterprise Plus 99.99%, and Azure SQL Database supports point-in-time restore. Google's shared-core Cloud SQL instances are not covered by the SLA, so keep production PHI on dedicated cores.
Remember the shared responsibility
A BAA covers the vendor's side. You still configure encryption, restrict access, log activity and train staff. MongoDB says using its cloud does not on its own achieve compliance, and Supabase documents a list of customer responsibilities.

Frequently asked questions

Which database is best for healthcare?

Amazon RDS is the best all-round choice for healthcare in 2026. AWS lists its SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Db2 and MariaDB engines as HIPAA eligible under the AWS BAA, and Multi-AZ deployments carry an SLA of up to 99.95%. MongoDB Atlas is the main alternative for JSON-heavy records.

What is the best database for medical data?

PostgreSQL on a HIPAA eligible managed service, such as Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL or Neon, is the best fit for most medical data. PostgreSQL was used by 57.9% of database respondents in the 2026 Stack Overflow Developer Survey, so tools and hiring are easy. For FHIR-native storage, InterSystems IRIS for Health is the specialist option.

What is the best database for healthcare apps?

For a small team building a healthcare app, Supabase or MongoDB Atlas is usually the best fit. Supabase covers Postgres, auth and storage under one BAA from its $599 per month Team plan plus a HIPAA add-on, and Atlas includes a BAA in its self-serve terms with Dedicated clusters from about $56.94 per month.

Is MongoDB Atlas HIPAA compliant?

Yes, MongoDB Atlas can be used for PHI under a BAA. MongoDB says the BAA is included in its Cloud Terms of Service for self-service, pay-as-you-go accounts, while invoiced customers must request one. Beta and preview features are not covered.

What is the cheapest HIPAA-compliant database?

Google Cloud SQL has the lowest published entry rate at $0.0105 per hour for a shared-core instance, covered by the Google Cloud BAA. Shared-core instances are outside the Cloud SQL SLA, though. Crunchy Bridge has the lowest flat plan at $10 per month, but confirm its BAA terms first.

Does a BAA make my database HIPAA compliant?

No. A BAA covers the vendor's obligations, but you still configure encryption, access control and audit logging. MongoDB says its cloud does not on its own achieve compliance, and Supabase lists responsibilities customers keep after signing its BAA.

Questions or corrections: editorial@statlyst.com · Disclosure

More rankings